Ottawa LRT Stage 2 Line 2 in Emojis

Ottawa Line 2 ๐Ÿš† Stage 2

Bayview ๐Ÿš‰ โ†”๏ธ Line 1 ๐Ÿšˆ East-West
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

Gladstone ๐Ÿš‰
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

Carling ๐Ÿš‰
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

Carleton ๐Ÿš‰
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

Mooneyโ€™s Bay ๐Ÿš‰
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

Walkley ๐Ÿš‰
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

Greenboro ๐Ÿš‰
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

South Keys ๐Ÿš‰ โ†”๏ธ Airport Link ๐Ÿš†
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

Leitrim ๐Ÿš‰
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

Bowesville ๐Ÿš‰
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

Limebank ๐Ÿš‰

Alternative with washrooms

Ottawa Line 2 ๐Ÿš† Stage 2

Bayview ๐Ÿš‰๐Ÿšป โ†”๏ธ Line 1 ๐Ÿšˆ East-West
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

Gladstone ๐Ÿš‰
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

Carling ๐Ÿš‰
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

Carleton ๐Ÿš‰
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

Mooneyโ€™s Bay ๐Ÿš‰
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

Walkley ๐Ÿš‰
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

Greenboro ๐Ÿš‰
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

South Keys ๐Ÿš‰ โ†”๏ธ Airport Link ๐Ÿš†
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

Leitrim ๐Ÿš‰
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

Bowesville ๐Ÿš‰
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

Limebank ๐Ÿš‰๐Ÿšป

Airport Link

The Airport Link is a separate line; you have to change trains at South Keys Station.

Ottawa Line 2 ๐Ÿš† Stage 2 Airport Link

South Keys ๐Ÿš‰ โ†”๏ธ Line 2 ๐Ÿš†
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

Uplands ๐Ÿš‰
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

Airport ๐Ÿš‰ โ†”๏ธ โœˆ๏ธ

Emojis Used

See Also

November 13, 2018ย  Ottawa LRT Stage 2 maps

September 10, 2019 Ottawa LRT Stage 1 Line 1 in Emojis

Ottawa LRT design issues

There were 8.4 million New Yorkers and at one point, I thought there were 8.4 million traffic engineers because everyone had really strong opinions. – Janette Sadik-Khan

The east-west double-tracked Ottawa LRT (Confederation Line, Line 1) is well designed.ย  It has complete grade separation, which means it never intersects with car traffic.ย  It is electrically-powered.ย  It uses modern Communications-Based Train Control (CBTC), enabling trains to be safely run with low “headways” (trains arrive closely together in time), even though the trains are switching tracks at the end of the line (e.g. the east-bound train arriving at Blair turns into a west-bound train, heading back west for a while on the same track it arrived on).

CBTC means that trains are substantially automated.ย  The CBTC system keeps track of all of the train locations.ย  To some extent once you decide on the train spacing, it is CBTC that decides how fast trains go, which rail segments trains are on, and what the settings of the track switches are.

The rail operators are basically in an oversight mode, monitoring things and dealing with exceptions.

This post covers general light-rail transit (LRT) system design considerations and examines the results of Ottawa’s design choices.ย  It is particularly focused on why a single door failure on a single train could cause a cascade failure across the system (which is now less the case after software changes).

This post does not address other issues with Ottawa’s Line 1 LRT system including build and maintenance issues with the vehicles themselves and with the rails, overhead catenary power, and stations.

I am not an expert in train systems, but what follows is my analysis as someone who has done a lot of computer network system troubleshooting.

This blog post covers a number of aspects of the LRT system design:

Cascade Failure

In the design of complex systems, you want to avoid a cascade failure.ย  That is, the failure of a single component should not cause the failure of most or all of the entire system.ย  In the context of a rail system:

failure of a single train should not have a significant impact on the rest of the rail system.

Unfortunately in this area of design, Ottawa’s Light Rail Transit (LRT) currently fails.ย  The fundamental issue is not the doors, the issue is

when a train is in door failure mode, it cannot move under control of the CBTC system.

That means a train in door failure mode has to be excluded from CBTC.ย  But since CBTC controls all the movement of all the trains, in order to safely exclude a train from control you have to remove an entire track from control, and manually drive the train back, slowly, to a safe location or maintenance location.

But you’ve then converted your dual-track system into a single-track system, with trains going both ways on a single track.ย  As you can imagine, that’s a situation where you have to be incredibly careful, and clearly you can only use the track in one direction at a time.ย  So that’s why you go from 5-minutes-or-less trains to 15-minutes-or-more, because there is very complex and careful management needed behind the scenes to safely use the single track.

In short, removing a train from CBTC is a serious failure of the system, that causes dramatically reduced system capacity and dramatically longer spacing between trains.ย  It should have been the case that RTG and OC Transpo and city staff and whomever is involved in making these decisions did a risk matrix, and the risk assessment should have identified situations in which a train would have to be excluded from CBTC control and tried to minimize them.

In this specific example, as long as you can manage the safety issues of a train that has a door failure, you should continue to run that train under CBTC.ย  And there could be lots of human ways to manage the safety issues, including staff in the train and staff on the platform, as well as station announcements.

UPDATE: Ken Woods saysCBTC no longer needs to be cut out when bypassing doors.”ย  So this should fix the major cascade issue that leads to big train delays.

Also, for those of you who want to know more about solutions than design problems, I have highlighted OC Transpo’s Plans at the end of this post.ย  END UPDATE

The Whole Story

Now that we know the end of the story, we need to go back to the beginning.ย  Every component of the LRT is a design decision.ย  (In fact, the decision to have light rail rather than heavy rail is a decision in and of itself.)ย  While the design that won’t let a train travel under CBTC control is a single decision with huge consequences, the design that led to the door issues is a much longer story.

UPDATE 2019-10-16: This blog post is specifically about how door failures were happening, and how door failures could lead to a system failure.ย  The trains are complex machines running complex software; there are many other ways they can fail that I don’t address below.ย  END UPDATE

>> Low-floor vs. High-floor

There are basically two kinds of modern train design: low-floor and high-floor.ย  The difference is basically whether the wheels (the bogies, in train terminology) are within the floor space (low floor) or below the floor space (high floor).ย  Most metro systems (e.g. New York) have high floor, and you also see this in VIA Rail trains, which is why you have to go up a set of steps from ground level to get into a VIA train.

High-floor means either you need steps to get onto the train (which is no good for modern accessibility) or you need high platforms, with the rails fairly deeply below the platform level (e.g. as you see in New York).ย  High-floor also means that the space inside the train car is completely unobstructed, it’s just an empty box you can arrange as you want.

Modern trams are designed to work at street level, because in many cases they’re running on regular streets mixed with car traffic.ย  Since you can’t reasonably design either deep trenches into the street or periodically raise the sidewalk up dramatically for tram stops, modern trams are low-floor.

Since Ottawa has a totally grade separated system with dedicated stations, we could have chosen high-floor, but we didn’t.

Ottawa uses a low-floor tram design, the Citadis Spirit.

That means the wheels reach up into the interior of the train cars, which is why you get those characteristic humps inside the trains, usually with seating on them.ย  It also means you get a narrow corridor between the humps (which is the spacing between the wheels on either side of the train).

>> Seating

There are basically two kinds of seating design for transit: front and rear-facing seats, like you see on a bus, and side seating (perimeter seating), like you see on a metro system (e.g., again, New York).ย  You would generally choose side seating for a high-capacity system, which means most people are standing, and front and rear-facing for a more comfortable but lower capacity system.

A critical difference is that you can clear side-seating cars quickly, because most people are standing anyway.ย  If it’s high-floor side-seating it is even better, because the space itself is completely unobstructed so people can move freely.

I’m not going to link to this article in DailyHive, because it has autoplay video – TransLink considering side seating for new order of 203 SkyTrain cars – but I will quote from it

perimeter seating generally provides more overall carrying capacity within each car with its allowance for greater standing room. This layout also creates more vertical and overhead handrails for standing passengers to hold on to.

With wider corridors between the seats, such a sideways seating layout could make the trains more efficient for quick ingress and egress through the car doors.

Kyoto subway 1117 priority seat area 01
Priority seat area on Kyoto Subway 1117

Ottawa’s trams have a fairly conventional front and rear-facing seat arrangement, which in combination with low-floor means that there are some pinch points within the train.ย  In the worst case to get off at a station you might have to stand up, walk through a narrow corridor between seats, and then make your way through the people standing next to the doors.

There are lots of human-factor considerations about which kinds of seating people prefer.ย  See e.g. Chicago magazine – subway seating options.

>> The Overhead Bar

In general you want people equally distributed along the interior of your train car.ย  But Ottawa’s cars have very high grab bars with no straps hanging down, which means lots of people can’t reach the bars to hold on.ย  If you’re standing, you really want to have the comfort of a handhold.ย  Because of this, people are clustering near areas where lower handholds are available.

>> I’ve Got a Door in my Pocket

There are two kinds of door design.ย  In a metro system (e.g. yes, New York again) you have pocket doors, where the doors slide into the side of the car.ย  In Ottawa’s trams, the doors instead open out and over, physically moving outside and to the side of the doorway.

I’m no door expert, but doors that run back and forth on a track, doors that are mostly inside the side of the train seem like they would have fewer failure modes than doors that have to go through a complex range of motion to close, and sit fully exposed to manipulation on the outside edges of the doorway.

Be mindful that doors of either design fail on transit systems all the time; it’s the most common failure.ย  See e.g.

Train Design Summary

So basically the train things under design control are:

  • high-floor vs. low-floor, which determines how much usable space you have inside the train car, and some of the ease of movement within the car
  • front-facing seating vs. side-seating, which determines how much open space you have for standing passengers vs. seated space, and decides to some extent how easy it is to move within the train car
  • grab bar and straphanger design, which will determine where people are comfortable standing
  • door design, which to some extent determines what kind of failure modes your doors may have

>> Dwell Time

The amount of time a train spends at a station is called dwell time.ย  To minimize the amount of time it takes get from one end of the entire rail line to the other, you need to minimize the amount of time each train spends at a station.ย  This includes minimizing the amount of time doors are open.ย  Ottawa’s LRT doors are on automated timings, I believe of less than two minutes per station.

>> The Bus Legacy

The bus is very different from the train.ย  The bus is an entirely human-driven system.ย  Everything is under human control.ย  The driver can decide when to stop, where to stop, when to open and re-open the doors, everything.

The bus is also super-jolty.ย  In particular if the brakes are jammed on at a stop or due to cars or other roadway dangers, or due to acceleration when departing a stop.

The bus is unpredictable due to cars, so it may arrive at a time different from the planned schedule.

The bus in many cases is infrequent, sometimes running only every half-hour.

These characteristics make for certain very understandable human behaviours on the bus.

First, people will often try to sit down as quickly as possible, in order to avoid being standing when the bus jolts into motion.ย  Also people will try to stand up as late as possible, in order to avoid being standing when the bus jolts to a halt.ย  And in general people would rather sit than stand, due to the aforementioned jolting plus added bumpiness of the ride in general.

This means people are quite often late to exit the bus, and just push the bars to hold or reopen the doors, or shout at the bus driver (“back door!”) to get the doors open if they’re outside the automatic door cycle.

So: slow to exit the bus.

The unpredictability of the bus means that when people do see a bus, they will run to grab it, often requiring the driver to stop and reopen the doors.

So: in a rush to get on the bus.

The flow of passengers on and off the bus is managed by a combination of bus driver oversight and passenger control, including people stepping off and back onto the bus if it is super crowded, with the passengers inside holding the door.

These behaviours don’t translate at all well to the train, which is nothing like the bus.ย  The train is smooth, and the doors are entirely on automatic timing, and (outside of major system failure) there is another train coming soon.

>> Platform Human Factors

On a platform, you want people to spread out so that they are using all the doors equally.ย  But it’s just human nature that people tend to stop as soon as they reach the bottom of the stairs.ย  It will take some time for people to switch from the bus mindset of basically standing near a single location to automatically moving down the platform.

>> Rush Hour

The Commute as we call it, Rush Hour, is an entirely separate design issue about which I will probably do a separate blog post.ย  But since we can’t redesign the entire city, and change school and employer expectations and employee behaviour, we’re stuck with this super-peak of demand called Rush Hour.

So you have to design your system for Rush Hour.

Normally what would happen is your system is adapted as Rush Hour grows.ย  Your system changes as demand changes.ย  If you do have to switch to a new system once demand reaches a certain level, you switch early, let’s say at 75% to 80% of capacity.

The huge design issue in Ottawa was that we waited until our system was basically at 100% capacity before switching to a new design, before switching from Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) to LRT.ย  (I will set the unfortunate politics of Canadian transit that caused this late shift aside.)

That means we went from a 100% capacity Rush Hour BRT system to an LRT system that would have very heavy peak demand.

Very heavy demand is a transit planner’s dream in some sense.

Unfortunately it would be very hard to simulate this level of real-world demand.ย  You’d have to have literally thousands of volunteers.

Another option would be to gradually ramp up demand, and adjust step by step.ย  But with a complex bus system this would have been tricky and confusing, with buses removed gradually over time.

Presumably transit planners thought that by instead running the entire bus system in parallel for three weeks, they were doing the best they could at gradual demand increase, assuming people would slowly transition from bus to train during those weeks, so that by the end they would be running at full train demand.

What seems to have happened though is a step change in demand when the buses were discontinued.

And Now The Deluge

That step change in demand seems to have triggered a cascade failure, which goes something like this:

1. Buses are now dropping off all of their passengers at Blair and Tunney’s, creating peak demand that needs to be quickly cleared.ย  So there are two big boarding demand sources.

2. People are mostly going to work or to school, which means heavy demand to get off the train at uOttawa and Parliament Stations.

3. With the extra number of people added by the end of the parallel bus service, the design of the trains means that people are not getting to the doors in time.ย  This is a combination of design factors:

a. low-floor design means there are some narrow corridors in the train cars
b. front and rear-facing seating means there are lots of people seated
c. having lots of seating means people have to navigate their way past the seats
d. high grab bars means that standing passengers cluster in certain areas of the car where they can reach a handhold

Plus which let’s keep in mind that humans don’t like “crush load“.ย  People will stand together, but they’re not necessarily going to pack themselves together to fill the maximum capacity of the train.

4. The automated door timing that is part of short dwell times at stations means people are not able to get out at their station before the doors close.

For a passenger, not getting off at your station is basically a serious transit failure when you’re on a train.ย  If you need to get off at uOttawa and you can’t get off, you’re stuck either trying to train back or walk back, when you may have timed things to get to class or an exam.ย  Train transit systems must be designed so people can get off at their stop.

When people can’t get off at their stop they will understandably panic and try to get the doors open.

5. The automated door timing that is part of short dwell times at stations means people may not be able to get on at their station before the doors close.

This is not a failure in a train transit system with frequent trains.ย  You wait for the next train.ย  But keep in mind this is not at all how the bus worked.ย  So people understandably are trying to rush onto the train, and they are trying to get the doors open to do so.

6. Getting off and on magnified

The next thing that will happen is if people have learned they may not get off and on the train as designed, they will change behaviours in ways that magnify the problem.

People worried about getting off will stand near the doors even if it isn’t their stop, which means they will slow people who need to get off the train.

People worried about getting on will stand near the doors and rush the doors, which means they will slow people who need to get off the train.

So as soon as people lose confidence in the train it gets even worse.

7. Apparently the doors can error out in two ways.ย  If the door tries to close three times and it can’t, it will error out, which the train operator can reset.ย  But if the door is physically out of alignment, this is basically an unfixable error until it is realigned.

This is where the real problem comes.

(Note: The door failure described below no longer causes a cascade system failure in most cases.)

Failed doors are to be expected in transit systems.ย  But the train control (CBTC) system we have (Thales SelTracโ„ข) in combination with the train we have (Alstom Citatis Spirit) has this decision in its risk matrix: a train with failed doors is not allowed to move under automated train control.

My thanks to Ken Woods (@drivesincircles) for explaining the train control issue on Twitter.

This was the eye-opening tweet for me:

He goes on to provide additional detail:

CBTC also enforces train suitability, meaning the CBTC system will not allow a train to move with a safety issue like an open door.ย  So, bypassing that safeguard requires us to bypass CBTC, making the train itself invisible to the other trains being controlled by CBTC.
โ€” Ken Woods (@drivesincircles) October 9, 2019

Once bypassed, we have to move that invisible train back to the depot, and prevent other trains from getting too close. A bypassed train can only move at 25kph, and for obvious reasons cannot stop at stations.
โ€” Ken Woods (@drivesincircles) October 9, 2019

I blinked too. The train will not authorize traction with an open door and an active VOBC. No idea if this is an Alstom or Thales thing, but the door loop override kills movement until the train is cut out.
โ€” Ken Woods (@drivesincircles) October 9, 2019

(VOBC means Vehicle On-Board Controller or sometimes Vehicle On-Board Computer.)

And this CBTC interaction with the trains is where everything falls apart.

Because the train can’t move under automated control, the entire less-than-5-minutes train system running on dual tracks gets replaced with a single track under automated control and a manual track where the train slowly chugs back to be repaired.

This means trains now arrive at something like 15 minute or longer intervals.

But Rush Hour peak demand means hundreds of people arriving continuously by bus at Blair and Tunney’s, which means they have to be cleared out on packed trains every 5 minutes or less, or the stations become dangerously crowded.

Which is what happened.

We should just be grateful that people managed this massive overcrowding.

UPDATE: Ken Woods saysCBTC no longer needs to be cut out when bypassing doors.”ย  So this should fix the major cascade issue that leads to big train delays.ย  END UPDATE

Immediate Fixes

>> Dwell Time

Probably the easiest fix is to change the dwell times for the trains, particularly at busy stations.ย  This means just change the door times so they are open longer.ย  This will mean longer end-to-end train rides for everyone, but should greatly reduce the door issues.

>> Boarding Decals

We could also put down boarding decals.ย  People in Ottawa love following signs.ย  But this means the doors have to always be at the same position, regardless of train direction or train configuration, and I’m not sure this is the case (you’d have to check with OC Transpo).

TTC platform decals
Decals from TTC expanding boarding decals test to southbound St George platform

>> Straphangers

Install straps so that people can stand safely anywhere in the train.

>> Buses

If we are still having capacity issues, OC Transpo needs to add buses back into the system.ย  Yes, I know this is a terrible option.ย  It seems like there are some peak demand points, so these could be e.g. express buses that go only Blair to uOttawa or only Tunney’s to Parliament.

Medium-Term Fixes

>> Change Automated Control Scenarios

The most important fix of all is to examine train failure modes, and re-evaluate when a train should be excluded from automated (CBTC) control.ย  The goal should be to find mitigations so that exclusion from automated control is minimized.

As long as it is safe to do so, it is way way better to run an empty train with a door fault under automated control, than to shut down an entire track and massively increase the time between trains.

UPDATE: Ken Woods saysCBTC no longer needs to be cut out when bypassing doors.”ย  So this should fix the major cascade issue that leads to big train delays.ย  END UPDATE

>> Min Headway

If we can get headways (spacing between trains) even lower, say 3 minutes or less, it will ease platform demand.ย  But I understand there are risks with pushing the system to tight spacing, and so this is something to set as a goal for the medium term.

However, headway is more complicated than it might initially seem, as the rail operators have to switch from one end of the train to the other at the end stations.

On a 4 minute headway, the train pulls in and leaves again within 240 seconds if it is precisely on time. It takes the operator 120 seconds to change ends. – Ken Woods

Long-Term Fixes

For Stage 2, Ottawa should look at side seating for the trains.

But this is a design decision with consequences too: it means long standing commutes for people coming from the most distant stations, and it means some people having to stand on totally uncrowded trains outside of Rush Hour.

Please feel free to correct me if anything above is wrong.

Context

The thing is, this really is mainly a combination of factors that cascade at Rush Hour.ย  The system is very pleasant and reliable outside of peak demand.ย  In a way there are two different systems, which makes for a challenging design problem.ย  If you’ve only been on the train during peak demand hours, you should try it out during the weekend or in the middle of the day; it’s quite a different experience.

OC Transpo’s Plans

The good news is OC Transpo knows what they are doing, so they are already putting in place some of the key elements above, including:

  • A plan to install strap hangers in trains;
  • Adjusting dwell times (the amount of time a door is kept open) at stations aligning the timing to passenger volume and train frequency times;
  • Installing markings on platforms guiding customers on where to wait, so as to not block customers who are stepping off trains. [So I guess train doors are at consistent locations after all.]

Thanks to Councillor Glen Gower for sharing this information in his blog (found via Twitter).

UPDATE 2020-05-23: OC Transpo did all the things listed above.ย  END UPDATE

UPDATE 2019-10-16: OC Transpo has posted two letters explaining the situation and giving planned actions, one on October 8, 2019 and one on October 10, 2019.ย  The October 10 letter is the one extracted above.ย  As a reminder, this is fairly specific to door faults causing system problems; there are lots of other kinds of problems the trains can have that require them to go back to the maintenance depot.ย  END UPDATE

UPDATE 2019-10-18: OC Transpo has released a web page called The O-Line with details about train and related transit issues and planned solutions.

The O-Line covers some key topics including O-Train doors, improvements to stations, improvements to bus operations, and Winter Operations.

SIDEBAR: Train terminology

UPDATE 2020-02-19: Corrected explanation of TCMS, VOBC and CBTC below.ย  I had misunderstood what the difference between TCMS and VOBC was.ย  END UPDATE

In The O-Line they talk about the Train Control Management System (TCMS).ย  This is the computer on an individual train.ย  Like all computers it can have errors and need to be reset.ย  In addition to the TCMS, each train has a Vehicle On-Board Controller (VOBC), which is the component that communicates with the central system (particularly in relation to position of the trains).ย  The central control system for all the trains is called Communications-Based Train Control (CBTC).ย  END SIDEBAR

END UPDATE

I have to agree with this Canadian Press article: Despite Ottawa’s LRT woes, experts say don’t judge right away.

Ottawa LRT Stage 1 Line 1 in Emojis

Ottawa Line 1 ๐Ÿšˆ

Tunney’s Pasture ๐Ÿš‰ โ†”๏ธ ๐ŸšŒ West
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

Bayview ๐Ÿš‰ โ†”๏ธ Line 2 ๐Ÿš† South
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

Pimisi ๐Ÿš‰ โ†”๏ธ OC Transpo ๐ŸšŒ Gatineau
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

Lyon ๐Ÿš‰๐Ÿš‡ โ†”๏ธ STO ๐ŸšŒ Gatineau
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

Parliament ๐Ÿš‰๐Ÿš‡
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

Rideau ๐Ÿš‰๐Ÿš‡
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

uOttawa ๐Ÿš‰
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

Lees ๐Ÿš‰
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

Hurdman ๐Ÿš‰ โ†”๏ธ ๐ŸšŒ South
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

Tremblay ๐Ÿš‰ โ†”๏ธ VIA Rail ๐Ÿš†
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

St-Laurent ๐Ÿš‰
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

Cyrville ๐Ÿš‰
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

Blair ๐Ÿš‰ โ†”๏ธ ๐ŸšŒ East

Alternative with washrooms, retail, and bus stop signs

Ottawa Line 1 ๐Ÿšˆ

Tunney’s Pasture ๐Ÿš‰๐Ÿšป๐Ÿ›๏ธ โ†”๏ธ ๐Ÿš ๐ŸšŒ West
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

Bayview ๐Ÿš‰๐Ÿšป โ†”๏ธ Line 2 ๐Ÿš† South
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

Pimisi ๐Ÿš‰ โ†”๏ธ OC Transpo ๐Ÿš ๐ŸšŒ Gatineau
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

Lyon ๐Ÿš‰๐Ÿš‡ โ†”๏ธ STO ๐Ÿš ๐ŸšŒ Gatineau
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

Parliament ๐Ÿš‰๐Ÿš‡
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

Rideau ๐Ÿš‰๐Ÿš‡๐Ÿ›๏ธ
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

uOttawa ๐Ÿš‰
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

Lees ๐Ÿš‰
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

Hurdman ๐Ÿš‰๐Ÿšป๐Ÿ›๏ธ โ†”๏ธ ๐Ÿš ๐ŸšŒ South
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

Tremblay ๐Ÿš‰ โ†”๏ธ VIA Rail ๐Ÿš†
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

St-Laurent ๐Ÿš‰
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

Cyrville ๐Ÿš‰
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

Blair ๐Ÿš‰๐Ÿšป๐Ÿ›๏ธ โ†”๏ธ ๐Ÿš ๐ŸšŒ East

Thanks to Doug van den Ham for the idea about adding washrooms.

Emojis Used

I didn’t use the Tram emoji because trams travel in the roadway and typically have stops beside the sidewalk; trams are not the same as (heavy) railways or light rail. For some more info see previous blog posting iOS Travel emoji โ€“ railway vs tram.

UPDATE 2019-09-26: The in-station retail has been announced as Happy Goat Coffee, which leads to the inevitable alternative visual

Ottawa Line 1 ๐Ÿšˆ

Tunney’s Pasture ๐Ÿš‰๐Ÿšป๐Ÿ โ†”๏ธ ๐Ÿš ๐ŸšŒ West
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

Bayview ๐Ÿš‰๐Ÿšป โ†”๏ธ Line 2 ๐Ÿš† South
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

Pimisi ๐Ÿš‰ โ†”๏ธ OC Transpo ๐Ÿš ๐ŸšŒ Gatineau
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

Lyon ๐Ÿš‰๐Ÿš‡ โ†”๏ธ STO ๐Ÿš ๐ŸšŒ Gatineau
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

Parliament ๐Ÿš‰๐Ÿš‡
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

Rideau ๐Ÿš‰๐Ÿš‡๐Ÿ
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

uOttawa ๐Ÿš‰
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

Lees ๐Ÿš‰
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

Hurdman ๐Ÿš‰๐Ÿšป๐Ÿ โ†”๏ธ ๐Ÿš ๐ŸšŒ South
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

Tremblay ๐Ÿš‰ โ†”๏ธ VIA Rail ๐Ÿš†
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

St-Laurent ๐Ÿš‰
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

Cyrville ๐Ÿš‰
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ

Blair ๐Ÿš‰๐Ÿšป๐Ÿย โ†”๏ธ ๐Ÿš ๐ŸšŒ East

END UPDATE

See Also

November 13, 2018ย  Ottawa LRT Stage 1 maps

May 10, 2020ย  Ottawa LRT Stage 2 Line 2 in Emojis

Ottawa LRT Stage 1 rollout with multi-step transit network changes

RTG is was supposed to achieve Revenue Service Availability (RSA) on August 16, 2019.ย  This is the handover to the city, not the launch.

The launch will be about a month after RSA, sometime in mid-September.

UPDATE 2019-08-23: The LRT was handed over to the city on August 23, 2019.ย  The launch date for LRT service to the public will be September 14, 2019 (at 2pm).ย  END UPDATE

But there are multiple steps before we get to a full new network of Stage 1 LRT plus OC Transpo buses plus STO buses plus reconstructed roadways.

1. Ottawa LRT Stage 1 LRT Launch

The LRT will launch mid-September, but the current bus system will remain in place for three weeks.ย  So it will be a mix of rail and parallel bus service.

OttLRT Line 1 Stage 1 Line_map1
from the OC Transpo Ready4Rail – Where will it go page.

The north-south Trillium Line 2 from Bayview Station will continue unchanged, but only until Q2 2020 (see below).

2. OC Transpo Bus Routes Optimised for LRT

Three weeks after LRT Stage 1 launch, specifically on October 6, 2019, the parallel bus service is discontinued, and Ottawa switches to a new bus network optimised for the LRT.ย  This will mean the end of the Transitway (9x and 8x) buses on Albert and Slater; no more Transitway buses through downtown.

OC Transpo Rapid 2018_Network_R 200
Map from OC Transpo New service types page.

Rapid buses (in blue above) will connect to the rail network at Tunney’s Pasture Station (westbound), Greenboro Station (southbound), Hurdman Station (southwest bound), and Blair Station (eastbound).

Bus Network Service Change - continued - Confederation-Line-Update-July-10-FEDCO-meeting-FINAL-E_20190710-145150_1

UPDATE 2019-08-23: The easiest way to figure out route changes will be to use the new trip planner, but if you want to know about a particular bus, you can start at the Ready for Rail – My Route page.ย  END UPDATE

For more on Stage 1 LRT see Ottawa LRT Stage 1 maps.

3. STO Bus Routes Optimised for LRT

At some point (sometime in 2020) after the OC Transpo switch to new bus routes, STO will also change its routes.ย  Which will bring buses back to Albert and Slater, as STO takes to these streets to run service through downtown to Mackenzie King Station.

STO Ottawa 2020

For more on STO bus changes see STO bus changes after Ottawa LRT Stage 1.

Street Redesigns – Rideau Street and William Street

Rideau Street and William Street will be redesigned, with one goal being higher pedestrian capacity.ย  Reconstruction began April 26, 2020.

Street Redesigns – Albert Street and Slater Street

At some point, currently scheduled for Summer 2020, Albert and Slater will be redesigned with space for cycling (see proposed designs in the public information sessions).ย  But note that Albert and Slater will not be bus-free; most notably there will be STO buses as indicated above.

Trillium Line 2 South – Stage 2 – Temporary Shutdown With Replacement by Bus Service

The Trillium Line (the north-south line) shut down on May 3, 2020 and will be closed for construction for at least two years as new stations and track are added for Stage 2.ย  During construction a bus service will run.

Full Service of New Stage 1 Transit Network and Redesigned Streets

Once all these steps are complete, presumably sometime in 2021, the downtown transit network and downtown streets will basically have their transformation complete.

LRT Stage 2

The next step will be LRT Stage 2, with new and updated segments scheduled for 2022 (Trillium Line 2 south), 2024 (Confederation Line 1 east) and 2025 (Confederation Line 1 west).

For more information, see Ottawa LRT Stage 2 maps.

Ottawa LRT Stage 3 maps

As the Stage 3 plan is neither complete nor funded, there isn’t a lot of definitive detail.

In Stage 3 Ottawa may extend commuter rail west to Kanata and south to Barrhaven, both from the west side of Line 1 (the red line, also called the Confederation Line).

It may also extend rail to Quebec over the existing but currently unused Prince of Wales Bridge, although there is also a Gatineau proposal to create a west-end rail system in Quebec that is proposed to run across the Portage Bridge.

Here is a high-resolution Stage 3 map

Stage 3 purple from Light-Rail-Transit-Project_Tech-Briefing_20190222_EN
from slide 109 of the Stage 2 Light Rail Transit Project: Technical Briefing – February 22, 2019 (PDF, Internet Archive) – Stage 3 extensions to Kanata and Barrhaven in above image in purple.ย  Please note this linked technical briefing presentation is all about Stage 2, it only has a single slide about Stage 3 at the end.

Based on Stage 2 completing in 2025, we would expect Stage 3 to be completed in the 2030-2031 timeframe, assuming they can secure Stage 3 funding.

See below for details of
Kanata
and
Barrhaven
Stage 3 extensions.

Note that the extension across the Prince of Wales Bridge may be complicated by STO’s proposed rail plan that would run instead on the Portage Bridge.

(If you landed here looking for information on Stage 2, please see my previous Ottawa LRT Stage 2 maps post instead.)

To some extent you can get a sense of the Stage 3 vision from the transportation network in the 2013 Transportation Master Plan. (The Transportation Master Plan normally would have been updated in 2018, but the city wants to complete Stage 1 of the rail system first.)

This map was a vision for the future (roughly 2028-2031 timeframe). The actual network will depend on many different factors including funding and route optimisation. Red is rail (Light Rail Transit), blue is bus (Bus Rapid Transit).

TMP - Rapid Transit and Transit Priority Network - Ultimate Network - tmp_en

Above from [2013] Transportation Master Plan, page 123 in the full PDF document or separate map download Map 3 Rapid Transit and Transit Priority Network โ€“ Ultimate Network (PDF).

UPDATE 2018-02-15: I would characterize the surface rail (tram) line running along Carling depicted in the 2013 map above as highly speculative. If implemented as a tram, sharing the roadway with cars, it would have the same reliability problems other North American streetcars have. (This type of tram with shared road space is common outside North America, and works well there due to a variety of factors including different road designs and slower vehicle speeds.) END UPDATE

UPDATE 2018-02-23: There has been a detailed announcement about Stage 2, including a new prospective map for Stage 3 (shown at the top of this blog post) and a new timeline.

Mayor Jim Watson tweeted

We are setting the stage for future expansion of 12km to Kanata-Stittsville [from Moodie Station] and Barrhaven. Additionally, the Baseline Station is protected for a future 10km extension to Barrhaven, and Bayview Station is protected for a 1.5km interprovincial rail link to Gatineau [over the Prince of Wales Bridge].

[Bracketed comments] and strikeout mine.

He tweeted a map with Stage 3 rail extensions in blue, but this is usually used for Bus Rapid Transit, so I changed the extension colour to purple (in the map at the top of this blog post).

Stage 3 is now at least six years (2025) away from being finalised and started, based on the new timeline for Stage 2. This would mean completion of Stage 3 in the 2030-2031 timeframe.

END 2018-02-23 UPDATE

Kanata (Line 1 West)

Ottawa’s east-west commuter rail Confederation Line (Line 1) is completely grade-separated, which means that it never intersects with car traffic. This is absolutely the correct design for a high-reliability commuter rail network. When extending the network into car-designed Kanata, however, it has the unusual result of a recommendation that part of the line be elevated. Any time you put rail under the ground or elevated above ground level it’s more expensive, but I guess there are a lot of highways for the Kanata extension to cross.

The website is ottawa.ca/kanataLRT

See below for the Kanata map.

Documents are available from the May 9, 2018 City Council (item number 16):

The separate Kanata Light Rail Transit Planning and Environmental Assessment Study is complete. I obtained official final versions of the January 2019 files from the City of Ottawa and have made them available on the Internet Archive at https://archive.org/details/klrt-epr-final-rev-3

Kanata LRT Stage 3 Map

In the map below, the proposed corridor and station locations are shown, with elevated portions of the line in green, at-grade in blue, and underground in yellow.

Kanata Fig 8-1 LRT Alignment and Station Locations

Map from section 8-3, page 168 of the August 2018 Report Draft from DropBox.

Stations heading west and then south:

  • Moodie Station (planned for Stage 2)
  • March Station
  • Kanata Town Centre Station
  • Terry Fox Station
  • Didsbury Station
  • Campeau Station (line turns south after this station)
  • Palladium [stadium] Station
  • Maple Grove Station
  • Hazeldean Station

A clearer map, but without indication of the sections above and below ground
kanata_lrt_map_en
from Kanata Light Rail Transit Planning and Environmental Assessment Study – Notice of Commencement of Transit Project Assessment Process

In the map above “LMSF” means Light Maintenance and Storage Facility.

The older diagram below from the earlier May 2018 report to City Council – Corridor Options (PDF) also shows the stations.

Kanata LRT Fig 4 Preferred Corridor

Barrhaven (Line 1 South)

Barrhaven is new addition to the LRT evaluations, although a rail line to Barrhaven was always envisioned as part of the Ultimate Network. The line would connect south from west Line 1 Stage 2 Baseline Station.

The website is ottawa.ca/barrhavenLRT

UPDATE 2019-10-14: There will be was an open house on October 30, 2019 at 6pm at the Nepean Sportsplex – Barrhaven Light Rail Transit (Baseline Station to Barrhaven Town Centre) and Rail Grade-Separations Planning and Environmental Assessment Study.ย  END UPDATE

There is a document from Transportation Committee on October 3, 2018 (also see meeting Agenda):

Barrhaven LRT Stage 3 Maps

Barrhaven LRT Stage 3 map

Above from page 5 of the Statement of Work document. Note that this is a study corridor, it’s not a proposed or final alignment.

Newer map highlighting study area:
barrhaven_lrt_keymap_en
Above from https://ottawa.ca/barrhavenLRT

In the above map BRT (the blue line) means Bus Rapid Transit.

Prince of Wales Bridge

You can see in the maps at the top of this blog post that there is a plan for OC Transpo’s commuter rail service to cross the Prince of Wales Bridge, but I don’t know any details. I don’t even know whether they would use Line 1 or just extend Line 2 northwards. I’m happy to add details if they are provided.

UPDATE 2020-05-17: I’ve written more about The future of the Prince of Wales Bridge.ย  There is currently no funding to do anything with it.ย  END UPDATE

Addendum

These are very early days, so rely on the City of Ottawa for official word on the specific rail lines and stations for Stage 3 LRT.

Previously:
November 13, 2018ย  Ottawa LRT Stage 2 maps

Ottawa LRT Stage 2 maps

Ottawa’s commuter rail (light rail transit, LRT) gets a lot more complicated in Stage 2.

As a reminder, there are two lines:

  • Line 1, the red line, runs east-west.ย  It’s also called the Confederation Line.ย  It uses all-electric trains, running on dual tracks (i.e. separate tracks for each direction).
  • Line 2, the green line, runs north-south.ย  It’s also called the Trillium Line.ย  It will use diesel trains, and has segments of single track (meaning that trains have to wait in carefully-managed stops, in order to share the track in both directions).

Line 1 extends east to Trim Station, but on the west side it splits, with part heading west and part turning south.ย  Line 2 adds stations and continues south, but then takes a rather dramatic turn to the west at the end of line.

Stage 2 System Map

In terms of implementation, the project is separated into three separate parts for the east and west (Line 1) and south (Line 2) extensions.ย  You can see the planned system in this Stage 2 map, including a Line 1 extension that was added in the west to Moodie Station and the new west turning to Limebank Station at the end of Line 2.ย  Below map from Stage 2 – Where (Internet Archive copy).

2022 2024 2025 OTT_LRT_Stage2_FullMap_11x17_FEB_2019_Bil(I added the dates.)

Black circles with black text boxes are new stations, and the new segments are also shown as thinner.ย  Note that bus rapid transit (the remainder of the Transitway buses) is shown in grey.

Line 1 gets 11 more stations in the west, 5 new stations in the east, and 38 more Alstom Citadis Spirit trains.ย  Target completion date is 2025.

On the green line (Line 2), two stations are added within the existing Stage 1 segment: Gladstone Station and Walkley Station.ย  Line 2 also gets an extension to the airport, but this is not a direct train; you have to change to an airport shuttle train at South Keys Station.ย  Line 2 will add 7 new Stadler FLIRT trains for the main line while continuing to use the existing Coradia LINT trains for the airport line.ย  Target completion date is 2022.

Also see Interactive Maps below.

UPDATE 2018-02-24: A detailed technical briefing including updated timelines, budget, and the selected private sector implementation groups was presented at a Committee of the Whole special meeting of Council on February 27, 2019 at 1pm.

The documents are available in the city’s SIRE agenda system.ย  There are two agenda items:

The report ACS2019-TSD-OTP-0001 Contract Award of Ottawaโ€™s Stage 2 Light Rail Transit Projects and Related Matters (PDF) has nine appendices of which the most interesting for me was Appendix 5: Station Descriptions and Technical Overview (PDF) which includes renderings of all the new Line 1 and Line 2 stations.

There is a very-high-level summary in city news release City holds technical briefing on Stage 2 LRT and the Preferred Proponents.

Stage 2 is made up of two projects extending the Confederation and Trillium Lines totalling 44 kilometres of new rail and 24 new LRT stations.

The marquee information is:

  • total cost $4.66 billion
  • Trillium Line (Line 2, north-south) extension target completion 2022, including a complete shutdown from May 2020 until September 2022
  • Confederation Line (Line 1) East extension target completion 2024
  • Confederation Line (Line 1) West extension target completion 2025

Ottawa Stage 2 LRT Table 5 Updated Schedule
above from page 61 of Contract Award of Ottawaโ€™s Stage 2 Light Rail Transit Projects and Related Matters (PDF)

The Trillium Line (Line 2) includes a completely separate Airport Link Line, a spur line from South Keys.ย  By completely separate I mean you have to change trains at South Keys, and in fact the Airport Line will run completely different trains – it will inherit the current Alstom Coradia LINT diesel trains, while as previously announced the main Line 2 trains will be new Stadler FLIRT diesel trains.

UPDATE 2019-12-11: The entire Stage 2 website (stage2lrt) now redirects to the City of Ottawa website.ย  ย The city website is https://ottawa.ca/en/planning-development-and-construction/major-projects/stage-2-light-rail-transit-project

ENDUPDATE

This news item doesn’t link to the new Stage 2 LRT documentation, which can be found on the Resources page, a giant list on the city’s site at https://ottawa.ca/en/planning-development-and-construction/major-projects/stage-2-light-rail-transit-project/resources

The contract award is in the city’s Legislative Materials section of the Resources page

https://ottawa.ca/en/planning-development-and-construction/major-projects/stage-2-light-rail-transit-project/resources#legislative-materials

The following presentation has a lot of useful information:

including many station renderings, and segment-by-segment construction schedules.

END UPDATE

Line 2 Extends South, then West

The details of the plan to extend Line 2 west are available in the Trillium Line Extension Planning and Environmental Assessment (EA) Study – Addendum.

I’ll only look at the end of the line, which is a change to the original Stage 2 plan.

Here is Earl Armstrong / Bowesville Station and Park & Ride

Earl Armstrong and Bowesville Station park and ride

Earl Armstrong and Bowesville Station plus park and ride functional design

Above two images are from pp. 68-70 of the Trillium Extension EA Study Addendum document (PDF).

Here is the extension west to Limebank Station

Limebank Station - extension

Limebank Station - preliminary station functional design

Above two images are from pp. 93-99 of the Trillium Extension EA Study Addendum document (PDF).

Line 2 Stage 2 Train Sets

In Stage 2 the existing Line 2 main line trains will be replaced with the Stadler FLIRT (Fast Light Innovative Regional Train).ย  It is diesel powered but can be converted to electric.

LRT2_Boards_48x36_EN_May02_2018

Above from City secures funding to extend O-Train Trillium Line to the heart of Riverside South (Internet Archive link).ย  I believe our trains will be much longer than depicted above.

The Stage 1 Coradia LINT trains will be used for the Airport Link.

DSCF9011-1099011-20150524
Above: Photo of Stage 1 Coradia LINT train on the main Trillium Line (Line 2) May 24, 2015

Figure 7 Stadler FLIRT and Airport Link Vehicles
above image of Stadler FLIRT from page 55 of Contract Award of Ottawaโ€™s Stage 2 Light Rail Transit Projects and Related Matters (PDF).ย  For illustration only; Ottawa’s vehicles will not look exactly like this and will have a different door configuration.

The February 2019 technical briefing included a much clearer Trillium Line (Line 2) train diagram.ย  Note that our Line 2 FLIRT trains will have two sets of doors per car, not one set as in Figure 7 above.

Ottawa LRT Line 2 vehicles Stage-2-Light-Rail-Transit-Project_Tech-Briefing_20190222_EN
above from slide 83 of Stage 2 Light Rail Transit Project: Technical Briefing – February 22, 2019 (PDF, Internet Archive link)

UPDATE 2020-05-14: There is a new image for the Trillium Line (Line 2) Stadler FLIRT train

Ottawa LRT Line 2 Stage 2 O-Train South Stadler FLIRT vehicle livery
Slide 59 from Stage 2 May 2020 Update (PDF) presented to Ottawa City Council on May 13, 2020.

END UPDATE

Construction and Status Updates

You can find construction updates on the city’s website under Stage 2 Light Rail Transit Project > Project updates.

There was an update presented to Finance and Economic Development Committee (FEDCO) on March 9, 2020:

There was an update presented to City Council on May 13, 2020:

Consultations

There was a consultation on Stage 2 Confederation Line (Line 1) West Extension [Pedestrian and Cycling] Connectivity.ย  The consultation closed July 10, 2020.

Ottawa consulted on pedestrian and cycling connectivity to the Stage 2 LRT Trillium Line South stations.ย  The consultation closed May 15, 2020.

There was also a connectivity consultation for Stage 2 LRT Confederation Line East but it closed in April 2020.

Information Session Presentations

Presentations can be found in the Resources – Community Presentations section of the Stage 2 LRT pages.

As you can see from the presentations above, there were information sessions in 2019 and 2020.ย  No further sessions are scheduled at the moment.

See all of the information session dates (there are no attached presentations on the session web pages) at https://ottawa.ca/en/stage-2-lrt-information-sessions

Website

See the City of Ottawa website in the major projects section, including station renderings.ย  The short link is Ottawa.ca/stage2 or go directly to https://ottawa.ca/en/planning-development-and-construction/major-projects/stage-2-light-rail-transit-project

The main website for Stage 2 was https://www.stage2lrt.ca/. Please refer to that website for official Stage 2 routes and station information.

Interactive Maps

There is an interactive map available on the City of Ottawa website.ย  You can zoom in to see details, as well as click on individual stations (red circles) to get more information.ย  Thanks to Mapping Ottawaโ€™s LRT on The Map Room blog for this information.

You can see Stage 2 track alignments in GeoOttawa.ย  Go to More layers… and select Rail Implementation Office at the very bottom (below Miscellaneous).ย  http://maps.ottawa.ca/geoottawa/ย  Note that GeoOttawa requires Flash.

UPDATE 2020-07-03: geoOttawa beta is available and works in any web browser.ย  END UPDATE

Stage 3

Stage 3 may extend to Kanata, to Barrhaven, and possibly across the Prince of Wales bridge to Quebec.ย  Details are not finalised; I have done a separate blog post with Stage 3 maps.

Ottawa LRT Stage 1 maps

Here’s what the Stage 1 commuter rail (light rail transit, LRT) network looked like when it launched on September 14, 2019.ย  This post focuses on the rail maps; there were also lots of bus route changes.

Maps

Line 1, the Confederation Line, the red line, runs from Tunney’s Pasture Station in the west to Blair Station in the east.ย  It is an all-electric, dual-track line (i.e. separate tracks for each direction).

It makes for a pretty simple map, from the OC Transpo Ready4Rail – Where will it go page.

OttLRT Line 1 Stage 1 Line_map1

Lyon, Parliament and Rideau stations are underground.ย  The Gatineau bus connection shown at Pimisi Station indicates OC Transpo Gatineau-bound buses.ย  The STO bus connections aren’t shown (they will be mainly at Lyon Station).

Line 2, the Trillium Line, the green line, runs from Bayview Station in the north to Greenboro Station in the south.ย  It is a diesel line with some single tracking, which means trains have to wait at stopping points in order to share the single track in both directions.

It also makes for a pretty simple map, from the OC Transpo Route 2 results page, PDF map option (Internet Archive link).

O-Train Route 2 map_carte_002

UPDATE 2020-05-06: Note that as work has started on Line 2 Stage 2; all of Line 2 is shut down as of May 3, 2020 for at least two years.ย  A bus service will run for the duration of construction.ย  END UPDATE

The lines have a single transfer point at Bayview Station.

Here is a Stage 1 map of just Line 1 and Line 2 together.

Stage 1 - Otrain_network_map
from OC Transpo Expanding O-Train service, specifically https://www.octranspo.com/images/files/ready4rail/Otrain_network_map.png

There is also a map (PNG) that shows all rapid routes, which includes the two train lines in red and green as well as buses in blue. Basically the blue is what remains of the workhorse Transitway / Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) lines in Stage 1. (Map from OC Transpo New service types page.)ย  You don’t see the downtown core buses on this map because they are a different service type, downtown buses are frequent and their routes would be in orange.

OC Transpo Rapid 2018_Network_R 200

Interactive Maps & Downloadable Data

You can see current and proposed station footprints and track alignments in GeoOttawa.ย  Go to More layers… and select Rail Implementation Office at the very bottom (below Miscellaneous).ย  http://maps.ottawa.ca/geoottawa/ย  Note that GeoOttawa requires Flash.

UPDATE 2020-07-03: geoOttawa beta is available and works in any web browser.ย  END UPDATE

If you want the data for Line 1 including station alignments, as shape files, you can get it from the City of Ottawa Open [Data] site https://open.ottawa.ca/datasets/o-train-line-stage-1

There is also open data for O-Train [Line 1] Stations Stage 1 (just the stations) and O-Train [Line 2 Tracks] (just the tracks), including Google Earth KMZ format.ย  The data are quite fragmented as they are mostly just extracts made by querying GeoOttawa.ย  Use the API Explorer option on the individual datasets in Open Ottawa to see the query that generated the dataset.

Rollout

For more on the rollout of Stage 1 LRT and accompanying bus network changes see Ottawa LRT Stage 1 rollout with multi-step transit network changes.

Websites

The website for the construction of Stage 1 was https://www.ligneconfederationline.ca/ (now that construction is complete, the website will no longer be updated).

There is also general information at https://www.octranspo.com/en/ready-for-rail/

and a specific OC Transpo page for Line 1 at https://www.octranspo.com/en/our-services/bus-o-train-network/service-types/o-train-line-1

There was a completely separate website for Stage 2 but now see the City of Ottawa website at https://ottawa.ca/en/planning-development-and-construction/major-projects/stage-2-light-rail-transit-project (I have covered Stage 2 in a separate blog post).

Addendum

In renaming and rebranding the lines there may be some confusion.ย  Previously O-Train referred just to the north-south train, now it is used for the entire system.ย  Also previously route 1 and route 2 were downtown core frequent buses.ย  Route 1 was changed to route 6, and route 2 basically ended up as two routes, the 11 and the 12.

The Stage 1 rail lines won’t change, but nevertheless always go to the OC Transpo website for the latest official information about routes.

See Also

September 10, 2019 Ottawa LRT Stage 1 Line 1 in Emojis

Ottawa and Ontario consultations March – April – May, 2015

Monday March 30, 2015

Western LRT

opens at 5pm, presentation at 6:30pm
Ottawa City Hall

http://ottawa.ca/en/city-hall/public-consultations/transit/information-session-march-30-2015

There is a somewhat-confusing diagram (PDF) on the consultation site.

Eric Darwin did four detailed blog posts: Westward Ho! One, Two, Three, Four (and uses a clearer diagram).

Twitter hashtag is #WLRT and the general hashtag is #ottLRT

Tuesday March 31, 2015

OPL

Starting at 7pm.

Consultation on a new Ottawa Central Public Library.

In-person at Ottawa City Hall is full.

You can still watch the live webcast though.

I will be using hashtag #ottlibrary
The declared hashtag was #OttCentralLibrary

I would imagine the library will be tweeting, @opl_bpo

UPDATE 2015-04-03: There is a very brief online consultation.ย  It was supposed to be an ideas market, but that broke, so now you can

email CentralLibrary@Ottawa.ca

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/pages/Ottawa-Central-Library-Biblioth%C3%A8que-centrale-dOttawa/681512461960430

deadline is Wednesday April 8, 2015

More info: http://ottawacentrallibrary.ca/#ideas and webcast archive at http://ottawacentrallibrary.ca/#webcast

ENDUPDATE

Capital Illumination

6pm

http://www.ncc-ccn.gc.ca/capital-planning/public-meetings/calendar-events/capital-illumination-workshop

Space is limited. Please RSVP to info@ncc-ccn.ca by noon on Monday, March 30.

NCC Capital Urbanism Lab tweets @NCC_UrbanLab

Wednesday April 8, 2015

Complete Streets open house

UPDATE 2015-04-03: Complete Streets open house moved to May 5, 2015.ย  ENDUPDATE

Thursday April 9, 2015

O’Connor Bikeway

opens at 6:30pm, presentation at 7pm
Ottawa City Hall

http://ottawa.ca/en/city-hall/public-consultations/transportation/open-house-april-9-2015

Ottawa has a Cycling Plan that includes separated lanes (Ottawa calls them “cycle tracks” running east-west and north-south).ย  The first major north-south route will be on O’Connor (although it turns into painted bike lanes in the Glebe).

(There is a larger issue, which is that cycling is still funded through a secondary “if we have money left” process, not as part of the main infrastructure in the budget.)

Ottawa Citizen article –
Segregated cycling lanes coming to O’Connor (sooner) and Wellington (later) – March 23, 2015

The general hashtag for cycling in Ottawa is #ottbike

Tuesday May 5, 2015

Complete Streets open house

opens at 5pm, presentation at 6:30pm
Ottawa City Hall

http://ottawa.ca/en/city-hall/public-consultations/transportation/open-house-april-8-2015
http://ottawa.ca/en/city-hall/public-consultations/transportation/open-house-may-5-2015

Unfortunately the city hasn’t provided any links to Complete Streets info.ย  And the presentation boards aren’t online (as usual).

The key item to know is that in Chapter 7 of the 2013 Transportation Master Plan, it says

Action 7-1: Adopt a โ€œcomplete streetsโ€ policy for road design, operation and maintenance

The Toronto Centre for Active Transportation did an analysis, and I also found a presentation from May 27, 2013. (If you have other resources, please feel free to share them.

More to come…

making commuting delightful

On November 26, Ottawa City Council unanimously passed the Official Plan, Infrastructure Master Plan, Transportation Master Plan, Ottawa Cycling Plan and Ottawa Pedestrian Plan.

Some of the highlights of the plans include:

โ€ข Investing $3 billion in public transit to build on the Confederation Line by extending rail further East, West and South of the City
โ€ข Bringing 270,000 more residents within five kilometres of LRT and ensuring that close to 700,000 residents (67 per cent of the population) will have ease of access to rapid transit

From ottawa.ca/liveableottawa

So that’s ~$2 billion for the Confederation Line from Tunney’s to Blair, plus $3 billion for LRT from Bayshore to Place d’Orleans, plus existing double-tracking of the O-train and new O-trains, plus extending the O-train.ย  Plus BRT to Kanata.ย  $5 billion.ย  To 2025.

stage2_brochure_final-Proposed_LRT

This is not a tram.ย  It is grade-separated commuter rail.ย  “Grade-separated” is a fancy way of saying the train never intersects with road traffic – it always goes beside, above, or under a road.ย  It never has to wait for cars and cars never have to wait for it.ย  (I think all of the LRT is grade-separated, I’m not sure if all of the O-train is.)ย  During the commuting peak, this train will run very frequently and very reliably.

This, in other words, is five billion dollars of being delightful to commuters.ย  This is a choice.

Ottawa and the NCC have had world-leading urban and transportation planners come and speak, including Jan Gehl, Ken Greenberg and Jeffrey Tumlin.

They all, without exception, said that we should be delightful… to pedestrians.ย  To pedestrians first, and then if we can, to cyclists.ย  (This is Tumlin’s terminology.ย  Gehl would say something like “invite pedestrians to walk and linger in the city and disinvite the car; you get what you invite” but it amounts to the same thing.)

It is incredibly cheap to be nice to pedestrians.ย  Flat sidewalks.ย  Shoveled clear sidewalks and intersections in the winter (not just plowed; the plow leaves a layer of snow on the sidewalk and a giant pile of slush in the intersection).ย  Pedestrian priority for crosswalks.ย  Traffic enforcement (particularly left and right turns on red, which should be banned at busy intersections).ย  Speedย  enforcement, through road design (to 30km/h anywhere in the city, and 10km/h anywhere residential).ย  Interesting things to see, shops at ground level.ย  This costs, seriously, nothing compared to roads and rail.ย  A few tens of millions of dollars for delight.

This is not crazy.ย  This is Copenhagen, Paris, London, New York, … this is every city that wants to attract a creative workforce, with high wages and high property values.

Instead, after listening to expert after expert, Ottawa is bowing to the suburban ring outside the city core, and making the commute delightful.

This does almost nothing for the city life itself, because the commute is a weird twice daily peak event.ย  From roughly 8 to 9, hundreds of thousands of people try to jam themselves as quickly as possible from their homes in the suburbs to their offices.

Note I didn’t say to the city.ย  This 1950s model of commuting is basically a teleporter fantasy we try to implement using cars and trains.ย  Ideally you step into your car inside your home garage, and minutes later, preferably without paying much attention, you “appear” inside your work garage.ย ย ย  In the evening, reverse.ย  This is not anything to do with city life.ย  This could be taking people from anywhere to anywhere.ย  This is basically a giant piston, shoving people in in the morning and out at night.

For commuters, the train must be frequent, fast and reliable.ย  Say every 5-10 minutes.ย  With minimal and very fast changes.ย  So we have to scale the system to handle the peak of the peak.ย  Hundreds of thousands.ย  You don’t need to spend time on the waiting area, because no one will be waiting long.

But outside the peak, this is a ridiculous system.ย  You have a commuter rail system designed to push hundreds of thousands in an hour, that then has almost nothing to do for the rest of the day.ย  A trickle of some thousands throughout the rest of the day.ย  Hardly worth running it very often.

So basically it’s $5 billion dollars for 10 hours a week (8-9, 5-6, M-F).ย  This is not counting billions more for highway widening and extension, for the commuters you don’t shift to rail.

So the people during the day who are actually moving around the city get to stand in the uncovered stations by the tracks in the middle of winter and wait, because they’re not commuters, so the train won’t be running very often.ย  And mostly the rail takes you to malls and schools and employment nodes, not interesting neighbourhoods with local shops.ย  And if you want to move around downtown – well it’s the bus for you, and an unheated shelter, if you’re lucky.

You can use Transit-Oriented Design to make the commuter train look less ridiculous, to give people a reason to use the train to get around from station to station during the day.ย  But unless you do it well, you’re just going to get a vertical suburb at the station, not what TOD is supposed to be, which is a walkable village around the station.

What you actually do in a real city is have commuter rail AND local rail (trams and if necessary subways) AND bus AND cycling AND most importantly of all, delightful walking.ย  What people remember of Paris is walking around.ย  Most people never touch the commuter rail, the RER.ย  If they do, they find it empty and often a bit dismal (a lot of graffiti and neglect).ย  What Ottawa is choosing is to build a city with RER and basically nothing else, for decades.ย  No trams (a tram is rail that runs on the street, with stops at the edge of the sidewalk).ย  No delightful walking.ย  No (also incredibly cheap) separated bike lanes, just painted lines that protect no one from tonnes of speeding steel.

This is council’s choice to make.ย  As a commuter rail system, it will be pretty good.ย  It will do nothing to transform the life of the city though.ย  It is a suburb-sustaining project, not a city-building project.ย  It is much, much better than spending the money on roads.ย  But a tiny fraction of it, 10% of it, would build some of the best pedestrian and cycling infrastructure in the entire world.ย  Council chooses again and again not to do this.ย  The winter pedestrian experience tells you, day after day, month after month: you are not important, you are not valued, only cars are important.ย  The cycling experience tells you: your safety is not important, you are not valued, only cars are important.

Here’s the thing: you can’t solve the commute.ย  Can’t.ย  No billions, no design, no transportation in the world can solve moving a giant peak load of people tens of kilometres in two one-hour windows.ย  If I were writing this in 1950 you could scoff.ย  But you can see the lanes widen year after year, and yet the commute doesn’t get solved.ย  Because you can’t solve it.ย  You can only eliminate the factors that cause it, of which the main one is people living a long way away from work.ย  The solution to the commute is to replace the commute with an actual liveable city where people walk and cycle short distances for work and shopping and friends, and ride the rails for very rare long distance excursions.

Instead commuter rail is a choice that will sustain a grey generic suburban city.ย  That’s our future.ย  That’s the will of council.

Ottawa Master Plan, Suburbs, and Transit-Oriented Development

For the 2019-2020 Ottawa Master Plan engagement process, see https://engage.ottawa.ca/the-new-official-plan

NOTE: All the information below refers to the 2013 planning process.ย  This information is now out-of-date.

The most important consultation is the Master Plan.ย  It is the driver for all other planning.

The consultation phase is winding down.

The barrier to providing feedback is low, just email: planning@ottawa.ca

The overall site is http://ottawa.ca/liveableottawa

The display boards from the consultation, in PDF form, are at http://ottawa.ca/en/city-hall/public-consultations/planning-and-infrastructure/draft-transportation-master-plan-open – NOTE that in the display boards it’s only the “affordable” maps that are proposed to be built, not the ultimate “network concept”.

The Master Plans, including Transit (Transportation), Walking and Cycling, are available in multi-part PDFs http://ottawa.ca/en/city-hall/public-consultations/draft-master-plans-now-available

Note to city: A ZIP file of all these documents would save a lot of downloading clicks.

They’ve extracted out the parts that impact your neighbourhood into separate documents, but good luck knowing your neighbourhood from ward numbers.ย  There are clickable maps.ย  Here are the documents for downtown Ottawa (“inner urban”):

If you know where to find the layers, you can navigate around the Master Plan proposals in the city’s mapping system http://maps.ottawa.ca/ (GeoOttawa)

Deadlines

You have until the end of October 2013.ย  After that, it will be another five years before the Master Plans are reviewed.

  • In writing, in advance of the Public Meeting and no later than November 1, 2013, or
  • In person at the official Public Meeting of Planning Committee on November 8, 2013 at 9:30 a.m.

What is being proposed

Bottom line is a commuter rail network (think Paris RER, mostly surface rail, sometimes underground) plus $70 million for cycling and $26 million for pedestrians (that’s spending out for decades, not next year).

Beyond the funded Confederation Line commuter rail, from Tunney’s to Blair, the unfunded Stage 2 plan reaches electric trains east-west from Bayshore to Place d’Orleans, and diesel rail south from Bayview to Bowesville.ย  It also extends the bus rapid transit (BRT; Transitway) west and north towards Kanata.ย  You can see the Stage 2 pamphlet (PDF).

The full transit network is shown in Transforming Ottawa’s Transit System – Affordable Transit Projects (PDF).

TMP Affordable Transit

Purple is existing rail, red is new rail, hard-to-distinguish blue-purple is new bus rapid transit, grey is existing bus rapid transit.

The good news is that this is a reasonable commuter rail network, and an ambitious schedule (the Mayor wants it built by 2023).ย  The bad news is

  • it requires provincial and federal funding for Stage 2 to happen
  • as with all municipal transit, the plan can be changed at any time at the whim of council (as happened with the previous LRT/tram North-South plan)
  • this kind of system should have been built before the city grew, not shoehorned in after
  • this expenditure will consume all available transit money until 2031 – there will be no trams (“secondary LRT” as the city calls them)

If the Greber Plan had just been a generation earlier, it would have done traditional city-building, which was to run commuter rail out to village centres.ย  This is how much of Europe is built out.ย  Europe still has suburbs, it’s just they are rail-connected.ย  But we landed just at the peak of car mania and train disdain.ย  So now we have to retrofit the commuter rail into the existing car suburb city.

Overall it is fine.ย  I still worry that extending the lines out, particularly going beyond the Greenbelt and providing park-and-ride, just encourages people to live even farther away from the city centre.

If you want my opinion on the most impactful things that can be recommended:

Another Puzzle Piece: Transit-Oriented Development & Station Area Plans

What is supposed to reduce the sprawl-enhancing impact of the commuter rail is transit-oriented development (TOD) around the stations.ย  This makes for some weird looking plans, as some of the stations are at malls.ย  Blair Station TOD envisions the big box sprawlmall of Gloucester turning into towers and a park.ย  It is to dream.

Anyway, if you haven’t exhausted yourself providing feedback to the Master Plans, there is also a whole set of TOD plans.ย  As usual buried away on the city site and not linked together.

Completed TOD plans at http://ottawa.ca/en/city-hall/planning-and-development/community-plans-and-design-guidelines/community-plans-and-stu-341 comprising Train Station (VIA Rail), St. Laurent Station, and Cyrville Station.

Draft TOD plans including Blair at http://ottawa.ca/en/city-hall/public-consultations/lrt-station-area-transit-oriented-development-tod-studies

Display boards (PDFs) and planner contact info at http://ottawa.ca/en/city-hall/public-consultations/planning-and-infrastructure/information-session-september-24-2013

Somewhere in the TOD plans there’s supposed to be 15 minute bikeshed plans, but I can’t find them.ย  All I can find is 600m walkshed plans.ย  With stations at malls, for e.g. Blair Station this basically leads to a plan proposing better sidewalks inside what are currently mall parking lots, but not proposing better connections to existing employment nodes nearby.

The feedback deadline was October 7, 2013 but I think that’s not fair because 1) The consultations were poorly announced and 2) the consultations were completely overshadowed by the bus-train crash.

There is also a separate Gladstone Station (proposed new O-Train station) consultation, because things aren’t confusingly separated enough.ย  Find it at http://ottawa.ca/en/city-hall/public-consultations/gladstone-station-district-community-design-planย  Deadline looks to be April-May 2014.

And Beyond: The Suburbs

If somehow you’re not exhausted and are still reading, there’s yet another consultation specifically on suburban design.ย  Here what is critical is to move suburbs to a village design, centred around transit, instead of car sprawl.ย  Good luck fighting that fight.

See: Public input needed to design future suburban neighbourhoods

also http://ottawa.ca/suburbs

email feedback to BuildingBetterSuburbs@ottawa.ca