High-speed rail has been extensively studied in Canada.
The latest study There was a joint Federal-Ontario-Quebec investigation in 2011. The links below are all to the same 2011 “EcoTrain” report, just distributed from the websites of the three different partners.
UPDATE 2017-05-19: In typical web fashion, all the links from 2013 were broken and gone with no trail to follow to find where they might have been relocated. I have added new links where possible.
Update – Ontario MTO English (from Internet Archive)
Update – Transports Québec: French
Update (older 1995 study link) – Transports Québec: Quebec-Ontario High Speed Rail Project, Preliminary Routing Assessment and Costing Study, Final Report, March 1995 (PDF)
There is also a Library of Parliament summary
HillNote Number 2012-06E “High-Speed Rail in Canada” (also available in French “ Le train à grande vitesse au Canada“)
and Wikipedia has a page of course: High-speed rail in Canada
We are not understudied in this area. But no one wants to spend any money.
Toronto to Montreal
The bottom line of the 2011 study: “Developing the section between Montreal-Ottawa-Toronto could cost between $9.1 billion for 200 km/h and $11 billion for 300 km/h” and “as a whole, the Montréal-Toronto segment of the project would provide a positive economic impact“.
Nine billion is not a lot of money for HSR connecting Toronto to Montreal, particularly considering you get a net positive economic impact (you get more back overall in the economy than you spend to build the infrastructure).
For the two speed options, which in the study are E300+ (electric, 300+km/h) and F200+ the specific dollar figures are $869 million net benefit and $817 million respectively, and that’s counting as “losses” the reduction in revenue to airlines and airports (
report page S-21).
And that is with modal shares I consider ridiculous. At 300km/h, the modal share for business travel in 2031 would be 17%? Seriously? In 2031, 72% of business people are going to choose to drive rather than go 300km/h in first class on a train? (from page 58 of the
This is in a world where today, Amtrak’s “high-speed” train (which only goes an average 120km/h, with a top speed of 240km/h) and its much slower regular train service together get seventy-five percent of the Washington-New York modal share.
In other words, even with ridiculously low modal shares and even inexplicably counting the diversion of traffic from airlines as a “loss”, Toronto-Montreal HSR still has a net positive benefit.
But no one will build it. All it would take is some outreach to external funding sources (Chinese government? Richard Branson?) and some political will. We have neither.
This post inspired in part by Tyler Brule in the Financial Times – Maple leaves on the line (April 26, 2013). Brule manages to say things like “Have neither the government nor the private sector ever thought about the economic benefits?” without mentioning any of the Canadian political context or any of the multiple studies (including repeated studies of the Quebec-Windsor corridor).
UPDATE 2013-05-02: I left a comment on Mr. Brule’s article. Here is the text in full:
Mr. Brule makes excellent points about high-speed rail (HSR): convenient for getting from city centre to city centre and more convenient than flying for short distances. However his question “Have neither the government nor the private sector ever thought about the economic benefits?” is somewhat puzzling in the Canadian context. The Quebec-Windsor corridor has been extensively studied for HSR, with the most recent report released in 2011. A copy of the report is available at e.g. Transports Québec:
Key findings: the Toronto-Ottawa-Montreal route (the specific route that would have provided HSR for Mr. Brule’s trip to Ottawa) would cost $9.1 billion for 200km/h service and $11 billion for 300km/h service, and in both cases the investment produces an overall net positive economic benefit. Other routes such as Montreal to New York have also been analyzed (available on the Transports Québec site).
What is needed is not more study of the economic benefits, instead what is missing is political will and private sector interest. Perhaps Richard Branson or other transportation entrepreneurs are needed, in order to invest in this well-documented opportunity to improve Canadian inter-city travel options.